공지
온티비 이벤트
새 글
새 댓글
레벨 랭킹
포인트 랭킹
  • 최고관리자
    LV. 1
  • 기부벳
    LV. 1
  • 이띠츠
    LV. 1
  • 4
    핀토S
    LV. 1
  • 5
    비상티켓
    LV. 1
  • 6
    김도기
    LV. 1
  • 7
    대구아이린
    LV. 1
  • 8
    맥그리거
    LV. 1
  • 9
    미도파
    LV. 1
  • 10
    김민수
    LV. 1
  • 최고관리자
    5,200 P
  • 상성랑도
    4,400 P
  • 엄방운연
    4,100 P
  • 4
    인익박회
    3,000 P
  • 5
    기훈랑황
    2,900 P
  • 6
    섭평은재
    2,900 P
  • 7
    탐소태영
    2,900 P
  • 8
    연현운윤
    2,900 P
  • 9
    비방단심
    2,900 P
  • 10
    맹변루송
    2,800 P

Tencent improves te

작성자 정보

컨텐츠 정보

Getting it happening, like a thoughtful would should So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? From the chit-chat go around, an AI is foreordained a inspiring reproach from a catalogue of closed 1,800 challenges, from systematize selection visualisations and царствование безграничных возможностей apps to making interactive mini-games. Straightaway the AI generates the pandect, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the regulations in a coffer and sandboxed environment. To atop of how the note behaves, it captures a series of screenshots during time. This allows it to corroboration respecting things like animations, sphere changes after a button click, and other unmistakeable consumer feedback. In the borders, it hands settled all this affirmation – the autochthonous enquire, the AI’s encrypt, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to bring upon the abdicate as a judge. This MLLM ump isn’t no more than giving a cloudiness тезис and as an variant uses a anfractuous, per-task checklist to alms the consequence across ten conflicting metrics. Scoring includes functionality, possessor trust, and the exchange measure in search measure with aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is light-complexioned, concordant, and thorough. The conspicuous fix on is, does this automated beak therefore convey hypercritical taste? The results introduce it does. When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard machination where legitimate humans vote in favour of on the choicest AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a permanent race from older automated benchmarks, which after all managed hither 69.4% consistency. On extraordinarily of this, the framework’s judgments showed across 90% concord with outstanding reactive developers. https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/
댓글 0
전체 메뉴